Save The Environment - Implement ISO 14001 Standards

Save The Environment - Implement ISO 14001 Standards

Evaluation of Compliance In ISO 14001 Standards

Evaluation of Compliance In ISO 14001 Standards

The requirement to establish a procedure for periodically evaluating compliance with applicable legal and other requirements falls short of specifically requiring regulatory compliance audits but, in fact, a system of regular regulatory compliance audits may be the most practical means for meeting this requirement of the standard. In the U.S., determination of whether to conduct a compliance audit will be governed in part by the particular jurisdiction’s approach to allowing a legal privilege for the self-assessment audit.

Evaluation vs. Audit – The difference between an evaluation and audit can only be determined by looking outside of ISO 14001. Consulting a dictionary reveals that an evaluation involves a determination of value or worth and that an audit is an examination of accounts done by persons appointed for the purpose. A better definition `is the more specific ISO 19011:2002, Guidelines for Quality and/or Environmental Management Systems Auditing, which defines an audit as a “systematic, independent, and documented process for obtaining audit evidence and evaluating it objectively to determine the extent to which the audit criteria are fulfilled.” Many organizations do not have a system for evaluating regulatory compliance other than their own records and the inspections of regulatory officials. This lack of a verification system can be a risky way to operate. Reports of enforcement actions and consent agreements show that many organizations are blindsided by rogue employees who violate rules and falsify documents to cover up environmental misdeeds. Although ISO 14001 does not prescribe a specific approach to evaluation of regulatory compliance, organizations should consider methods for going beyond verification of records by collecting and evaluating physical evidence.

ISO 14001 Standards Audit

ISO 14001:2004 emphasizes the continuous improvement of an environmental management system (EMS). The standard specifies requirements for an environmental management system to enable an organization to develop and implement a policy and objectives which take into account legal requirements and information about significant environmental aspects. The certification process ensures the conformance of your EMS against the international standard, as well as any organizational specific requirements that have been identified.

The ISO 14001 Standards audit consist of 2 stage registration audit process followed by surveillanceaudits, and ultimately a recertification audit. ISO 14001 Audits include on-site assessments of documents, data, records, activity and personnel. Process audit trails are followed by interviews of personnel responsible for the tasks and reviewing associated activity and records of occurrence. The audit trail will follow interactions between processes as well as the details of the process itself. Following are the stages of the audit process.

Pre-assessmentRegistration Audit – Stage 2Audit Findings• A review of action taken on nonconformities identified during the previous audit• A review of the continued effectiveness of the management system in its entiretyThe continued applicability to the scope of registration

The pre-assessment audit is an optional activity, outside of the registration process, it is highly encourages that any organization to undertake to evaluate the readiness to undergo the two stage registration process. That would optimally occur prior to the stage 1 and 2 audits.

Unlike the Stage 1 and Stage 2 activities you have full discretion as to which areas the preassessment should focus on and for the length of the pre-assessment. This activity allows your organization to become familiar with the audit process and helps prepare your employees for the registration assessment.

The auditor conducting the pre-assessment will typically return to the organization for the assessment. Similar to a ‘true’ audit, the end result of the pre-assessment will be a documented report identifying findings observed during the audit and a closing meeting to discuss the issues.

The pre-assessment activity allows you to correct any issues prior to beginning the registration process.

Assessment

New requirements for certification bodies have changed the registration process. Registration is now conducted in two distinct visits- Stage One and Stage Two- each of which has defined requirements that are outlined below.

Registration Audit – Stage 1

The stage 1 audit, conducted at your facility, is primarily performed for planning and determining the readiness of an organization to undergo a stage 2 registration audit. It also facilitates communicating any needs and expectations to the organization. Activities performed at a stage 1 audit include:

• Conducting a documentation review – This review determines if the organization’s EMS documentation adequately covers all the requirements of the ISO standard

• A review of the aspects and impacts and their significance and an evaluation of the facility(s) site specific conditions

• A review of your organizations non-conformance, preventive and corrective action system • An overview of applicable regulations

• Interviewing your organization’s personnel to assess their general readiness to undertake a stage 2 audit

• Confirming the applicability of the scope of the organization’s EMS

• Obtaining evidence that internal audits and management reviews are being planned and performed

• Providing focus for the planning of the stage 2 audit

If during the stage 1 audit any nonconformities are identified, the auditor will request a corrective action response (see Corrective Action Response).

The objective of the Stage 2 on-site audit is to assess your organizations’ adherence to your own policies, objectives, and procedures and to ascertain conformance to the requirements of the ISO 14001 standard. To accomplish this, the audit will address the implementation of all the elements of the standard. Review of documentation and records to support the implementation is an expected part of the assessment process. If non-conformances or opportunities for improvement are identified they will be documented in a report which will be presented to the organization during the closing meeting. The report will include the auditor’s recommendation regarding registration.

Any deviation from procedures or requirements of the standard will be identified as an audit finding, which will be documented in the audit report. The auditor will draw your attention to non-conformities as they arise so there will be no “surprises” at the closing meeting. Findings are categorized into three categories defined as follows:

• A major non-conformity relates to the absence or total breakdown of a required process or a number of minor non-conformities listed against similar areas. A major non-conformity at the Registration Audit – Stage 2 would defer recommendation for registration until that major has been closed.

• A minor non-conformity is an observed lapse in your systems ability to meet the requirements of the standard or your internal systems, while the overall process remains in tact.

• An observation or opportunity for improvement relates to a matter about which the Auditor is concerned but which cannot be clearly stated as a non-conformity. Observations also indicate trends which may result in a future non-conformity.

Corrective Action Response

ISO 14001 Standards requires corrective action responses from all Registration Audits. Once certification is achieved, dependant upon the extent and nature of the findings, your organization may be required to submit a corrective action plan, detailing your intent to correct the non conformity.

The auditor may also recommend that your organization submit objective evidence to support the to verify closure may be required.

It is recommended that all non-conformities are addressed within your internal corrective action system. Typically, opportunities for improvement would be addressed as preventive actions by your organization.

closure of the finding. In certain circumstances such as a major non conformity an on site activity

Surveillance Audits

Company shall conduct Surveillance Audits on an annual or semi-annual basis. The purpose of the Surveillance Audit is to ensure that the EMS continues to conform to both the organizations’ and the ISO 14001 requirements. Certain processes will be reviewed at each surveillance including:

• Internal audits and management review

• Customer and interested parties communications

• Effectiveness of the management system in achieving defined objectives

• The progress of planned continual improvement activities

• Continuing operational control

• A review of any changes made by the organization which may have impact on the registration

• Use of accreditation and certification body logos provided to the organization upon registration

• objectives, targets and programs

• evaluation of compliance

Re-assessment Audits

The accreditation body requires that a recertification audit be carried out every three years. The purpose of the recertification audit is to confirm the continued conformity and effectiveness of the management system as a whole, and its continued relevance and applicability for the scope of activity.

Recertification audits review the performance of the EMS over the registration period, and include a review of previous surveillance audit records. The recertification audit includes the following:

• The continued relevancy of the organization’s policy and objectives

• The continued effective interaction between the processes of the management system

• A review of internal audits, management reviews, document changes during this certification period

INTEGRATING THE NATURAL STEP ELEMENTS INTO ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS

In 1988, Dr. Karl-Henrik Robert began the process of developing the principles and objectives that have become known as The Natural Step.

Robert convened a group of over 100 Swedish scientists and asked them to develop a vision for a sustainable society based on the scientific principles. The Natural Step framework (Robert, 1991) was the result of this effort and is becoming widely recognized.

In this framework, there are four underlying principles or conditions and four guiding objectives.

These system conditions are:

Nature should not be subject to systematically increasing concentrations of substances extracted from the Earth’s crust;

Nature should not be subject to increasing concentrations of substances produced by society;

Nature should not be subject to systematically increasing degradation by physical means; and

People should not be subject to conditions that systematically undermine their capacity to meet their needs.

These conditions can be converted to four objectives that are more easily understood:

Eliminate our community’s contribution to fossil fuel dependency and to the wasteful use of scarce metals and minerals;

Eliminate our community’s contribution to dependency upon persistent chemicals and the wasteful use of synthetic substances;

Eliminate our community’s contribution to encroachment upon nature; and Meet human needs fairly and efficiently.

To apply The Natural Step, Boisvert et al. (1999) recommend an A-B-C-D approach: Awareness, Baseline Analysis, Compelling Vision, and Down to Action. Kent County chose to align its program with The Natural Step because of its simplicity and scientific basis.

An environmental management system (EMS) is a set of processes and practices that enable an organization to reduce the environmental impacts from its operations and increase efficiency. It helps the organization to systematically manage its environmental “footprint.” Alternatively, according to the ISO definition (ISO, 2004) an EMS is “a part of an organization’s management system used to develop and implement its environmental policy and manage its environmental aspects.” It is built upon the concept of continuous improvement and follows a four element Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle. The EMS is an evolving process and is consistently modified to accommodate new information, changing circumstances and changes in organization priorities.

The critical components of each of the four elements are:

Planning, includes identifying environmental aspects and establishing goals [Plan];

Implementing, includes training and operational controls [Do];

Checking, includes monitoring and corrective action [Check]; and

Reviewing, includes progress reviews and acting to make needed changes to the EMS [Act].

There are a variety of reasons that an organization may develop and implement an EMS. The reasons are many and varied and often depend upon the type of organization. A business with international offices has different reasons than a public agency to develop and implement an EMS. Table 1 provides a list of the most common of these reasons.

Some disadvantages to developing and implementing an EMS relate to the costs associated with development of the program and include:

An investment of internal resources, including staff/employee time;

Costs for training of personnel;

Costs associated with hiring consulting assistance, if needed; and

Costs for technical resources to analyze environmental impacts and improvement options, if needed.

Critical factors that assure the success of any management system include:

Commitment from senior management;

Designated staff including a Core team to act as a cheerleader and a representative trained in the program;

Involvement of all employees in the covered fenceline;

Dedicated resources;

A link to the overall strategic planning of the organization;

Sufficient time to develop and implement the program;

Proper follow through on the checking and acting components; and

A willingness to make the cultural shift required for the program to succeed.

The ISO 14001 guidance lists 17 elements, shown in Table 2, as the foundation of an EMS.

Several documents and publications cover the various elements of an EMS in detail. One of these is the US EPA publication “Achieving Environmental Excellence: An Environmental Management Systems (EMS) Handbook for Wastewater Utilities,”

Environmental Aspects (ISO 14001:2004, §4.3.1)

The requirement of §4.3.1 of ISO 14001 is to establish and maintain procedures 1) for identifying theenvironmental aspects of the organization’s activities, products, and services that it can control and those that it can influence and 2) for determining which of those aspects have or can have a significant impact on the environment. Understanding the requirement of this element of ISO 14001 is central to understanding the concept of an environmental management system.A single manufacturing facility has potentially hundreds of environmental aspects. How far must it go in identifying its environmental aspects to satisfy the terms of the requirement? ISO 14001 specifies that the organization is to identify those aspects that it can control and those that it can influence and that it must also take into account planned or new developments and new or modified activities, products, and services. These stipulations in the requirements, without actually drawing boundaries on how far the organization must go in identifyingenvironmental aspects, at least establish some categories of aspect that must be considered. Beyond this principle, each organization must identify its aspects comprehensively enough so as to not fail to identify a significant aspect or a legal requirement. An objection to comprehensive identification of aspects is that the organization may become so immersed in aspects identification that it loses sight of the end objective of the procedure, which is to determine significance.“Significant impact” is not a stand-alone term in §4.3.1. It is accompanied by the phrase “impact on the environment” and “environment” is a defined term. Significant aspects, then, are those environmental aspects that have or can have significant impacts on air, water, land, natural resources, flora, fauna, and humans. The organization determines, using its own criteria, what magnitude of impact on these seven environmental receptors constitutes a significant impact. Whether an aspect is regulated is not intended to be a factor in determining significance.Proper execution of the environmental aspects procedure is important, in part, because it lifts environmental management out of the regulatory compliance mode and into the mode ofsystematically consequences for the environment, irrespective of regulation. The organization that rigorously applies the environmental aspects procedure discovers many opportunities to improve environmental performance that regulation does not address, including:

· Use of energy· Consumption of materials· Environmental impacts of employee activities

· Environmental impacts of products and by-products post-manufacture, including distribution, use, reuse, and disposal

· Environmental impacts of services

· Unregulated waste streams such as carbon dioxide

Environment Policy In ISO 14001:2004

Environment Policy In ISO 14001:2004
To develop a successful and effective EMS, five key tasks that must be undertaken by management:a. Select an EMS CoordinatorThe selection of an EMS Coordinator is crucial to the success of your EMS. This person will be responsible for developing and implementing the environmental policy and the EMS. Great care must be taken to ensure that the person chosen is well qualified to handle the responsibilities associated with the EMS.b. Perform a gap analysisA gap analysis determines the differences, or gaps, between one system and another. Not only will this analysis identify the gaps, but it also should etermine the size of the gaps. These findings will lead to recommendations, project plans, and the identification of necessary resources for filling the gaps.
c. Prepare a budget, and obtain the appropriate resourcesAfter conducting a gap analysis, the EMS Coordinator will develop a budget that covers the necessary resources to complete an EMS that conforms with ISO 14001. For some organizations, this may mean establishing a budget for the entire process; other organizations may only need to update certain portions of their existing management system.
ISO 14001 Section 4.4.1 requires top management to provide the essential resources to implement, control, and manage the EMS.
d. Select an EMS TeamTop management and the EMS Coordinator may consider creating an EMS Team to assist in developing and implementing the system. This decision should be based on the size of the organization or facility that will be implementing the EMS.
This team should consist of key individuals from various divisions, departments, and operating work areas within the organization who are familiar with the facility, the various processes, and its environmental requirements. Diversity among team members will bring together a pool of expertise and ideas from which to develop and implement the EMS.
e. Develop an environmental policy The environmental policy is an essential part of an organization’s EMS. The environmental policy must establish the overall direction of the organization in terms of its commitment to environmental responsibility. A policy should also set the foundation and framework for meeting the environmental objectives and targets for the organization.
The ISO 14001 standard establishes certain requirements that an organization’s environmental policy must meet. If your organization already has an environmental policy, review this section to ensure it meets the ISO 14001 requirements.
The first requirement is that top management must establish and define the environmental policy. Note that ISO 14001 does not specifically state that top management must write the policy, only that it be committed to the policy and ensure its implementation.
These actions are essential in constructing a firm foundation for an effective EMS.

ENVIRONMENTAL and HEALTH & SAFETY COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST

Self-Audit Procedures
The following checklist should be used as an aid in reviewing your facility’s compliance with industry environmental and health & safety regulations and requirements.
Additional Information: This checklist is based on the current laws and regulations as of the date of publication. Regulations frequently change.
Therefore, you should review current laws and regulations for any recent changes in the requirements. Some of the items you should check include:
Additional Requirements: In addition to recent changes in the requirements, you should also consider additional Cal/OSHA standards that might apply to your facility.
These might include any of the following:
Employer postings; ergonomics; process safety management; use of asbestos, formaldehyde, or lead containing substances; blood borne
pathogens; welding operations; use of compressed air and gases; boiler operations; use of power tools, hoists and grinding equipment; spray coating; elevated platforms; aisle way, ramp, door and exit requirements; fire sprinkler requirements; and seismic requirements.
Legal Authority : The compliance requirements provided on the following pages are taken from the respective laws and regulations, as indicated in the references column. In addition to the statutory and regulatory requirements, some compliance items that reflect improved and accepted management practices have been included. These management practices have been included because of the

ISO 14001 – Specifications With Guidance for Use

ISO 14001 – Specifications with Guidance For Use
Given the number of international participants involved in the process of developing the ISO 14001 Specifications, it is amazingly brief, consisting of five pages. This includes a Scope, Definitions, and EMS requirements.
The heart of the specification is in the EMS Requirements, the principles of which are summarized below:
Principle #1 – Commitment and Policy Top management must make a commitment to the program.
Principle #2 – Planning To be successful, the program must be organized. This includes an organizational structure, open communications, both internal and external, and a mechanism for identifying issues.
Principle #3 Implementation Program must be undertaken, including training, writing process descriptions, and establishing prevention programs.
Principle #4 Measurement and Evaluation Create a mechanism for assessing performance and progress toward goals.Principle #5 Review and Improvement? ISO 14004, Section 4, Environmental Management System (EMS)
Reference: ISO 14004, Section 4, Environmental Management System (EMS) Principles and Elements.

ISO 14001 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AUDIT

In order to be in conformance with this provision of ISO 14001 an organization must be able to answer the overall question: “How does the organization conduct environmental audits of the EMS?”. In order to answer that question four specific tasks must be addressed under the Management System Audit section of the standard.
First, the organization must develop a program and related procedures that define an audit plan of the environmental management system. In addition the program must define frequency of the audit process. Second, the procedures must specify the methodology of the audit process, including the qualifications of the auditors. Third, the audit reports must be submitted to top management. Fourth, the audit reports must provide recommendations directed at correcting any reported nonconformance that was discovered in the audit process.
The audit process discussed in this section of the standard is directed at internal audits. The standard is silent on the frequency issue. Generally accepted practice with a mature ISO 14001 system is a total audit of the system once a year. In the implementation phase of an environmental management system a more frequent audit process might be appropriate. In addition any part of the environmental management system that has been previously determined to be in nonconformance should be audited with an increased frequency. The methodology of the audit process required by the standard requires two distinct steps:
A. determine whether the environmental management system conforms to the requirements of ISO 14001, andB. that the system has been managed as described in the Environmental Policy statement, the Environmental Objectives and Targets, and the related work descriptions and procedures.
It is critical that an audit report that relates a nonconformance be forwarded to top management

The Benefits To Integrate ISO 14001:2004 and ISO 9001:2008

The Benefits To Integrate ISO 14001:2004 and ISO 9001:2008
Reduce the time and cost of implementing the new specification by acquiring a concise, yet thorough understanding the scope of ISO 14001:2004 and key terms.
Avoid spinning your wheels by learning precisely which modifications and additions to ISO 14001:2004 require your attention for compliance with ISO 9001:2008.
Get a quick handle, through hands-on activities, on the environmental aspects of ISO 14001:2004, including how to:- Develop an environmental policy statement appropriate for your company- Integrate processes for identifying environmental aspects and impacts- Identify environmental objectives, set related targets, and establish programs for achieving results- Integrate environmental responsibilities and authorities into a management system- Outline an environmental awareness and training program- Establish environmental metrics and indicators for monitoring performance- Integrate requirements on non-conformance and corrective and preventive actions into your existing system- Understand the purpose and scope of the environmental management review- Integrate document control requirements of ISO 14001:2004 into your current system- Identify those operations that need to be controlled under EMS and identify emergency operations and contingencies that must be considered as part of EMS
Get off to a running start by learning to use a versatile prioritization matrix to identify and prioritize significant environmental aspects and impacts.
Optimize understanding and retention with the Plexus Learning Model- Multiple learning channels through lecture, coaching, group activities, innovative learning exercises and case studies.- Hands-on insights. Lecturing is minimized so learning is maximized.- Learn by doing. Connect the lessons learned to your real world by using your current circumstances as examples for activities.

ISO 14001 – Certification/Registration

ISO 14001 – Certification/Registration
Similar to the organized approach to problem solving contained in ISO 9000
and ISO 14000, an organized approach is necessary to achieve certification. Although the written requirements contained in ISO 14001 are straightforward and brief, the level of effort required to conform with the requirements should not be underestimated.
If an environmental review of the facility‘s operations has not been conducted, it is important to retain a qualified consultant to conduct the review. which should focus on the requirements of ISO 14000 versus programs currently in use. This activity is known as a Gap Analysis.?E After the Gap Analysis is completed, the environmental status of the operation should be known and the level of effort necessary to develop the ISO 14000 program understood.
It can easily take six months to a year to develop a program that meets EMS requirements. Staff should develop the EMS program as they will ultimately be required to manage it. If staff is inadequate to develop the program, a consultant can be retained to provide guidance to staff as the program is being developed.
But, retaining a consultant will not resolve the problem of long term program maintenance. The ultimate goal of developing the EMS is to obtain certification/registration. Aside from the internal benefits offered by the ISO 14000 series of standards, external benefits may be derived through the certification/registration process. The certification/registration process only applies to ISO 14001, and this is the only standard to which the audit process applies. For the purposes of certification/registration, all other ISO 14000 standards are considered guidance. Certification can either be by a self declaration?Eor by an independent registrar.
Obviously the use of an independent registrar would give more credibility to those looking at an organization from outside.
Registrars have individual preferences about how the requirements should be administered. A registrar should be selected early in the process to help ensure that the program being developed is consistent with the registrars preferences. When the program is fully prepared and implemented, the registrar will be notified and a formal program audit undertaken. This audit will not result in a denial of ISO 14000 certification, but it may result in either approval or a list of deficiencies that must be corrected before certification.

ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 Information Site

ISO 9001 And ISO 14001 Information Site
http://iso9001-procedure.blogspot.com/
http://iso-14001-ems.blogspot.com/
http://iso14001qualitymanual.blogspot.com/
http://iso14001requirements.blogspot.com/
http://iso14001certification.blogspot.com/
http://iso14001qualitysystem.blogspot.com/
http://environmentsystem.blogspot.com/
http://iso14000series.blogspot.com/
http://iso9000standard.blogspot.com/
http://six-sigma-qc.blogspot.com/
http://iso9001-documents.blogspot.com/
http://iso9001-training.blogspot.com/
http://quality-assurance-system.blogspot.com/
http://iso14001standard.blogspot.com/
http://iso9001-certification.blogspot.com/
http://iso9001-certification.blogspot.com/
http://iso9000series.blogspot.com/
http://iso9001standards.blogspot.com/
http://iso9000certification.blogspot.com/
http://isotemplate.blogspot.com/
http://iso9001training.blogspot.com/
http://qualitymanualsystem.blogspot.com/

Business benefits of ISO 14000

Business Benefits Of ISO 14001
Any manager will try to avoid pollution that could cost the company a fine for infringing environmental legislation. But better managers will agree that doing only just enough to keep the company out of trouble with government inspectors is a rather weak and reactive approach to business in today’s increasingly environment-conscious world.
There is a better way. The ISO 14000 way. The ISO 14000 standards are practical tools for the manager who is not satisfied with mere compliance with legislation – which may be perceived as a cost of doing business. They’re for the proactive manager with the breadth of vision to understand that implementing a strategic approach can bring return on investment in environmentrelated measures. Implementing an ISO 14000-basedenvironmental management system, and using other tools from the ISO 14000 family, will give you far more than just confidence that you are complying with legislation.
The ISO 14000 approach forces you to take a hard look at all areas where your business has an environmental impact. And this systematic approach can lead to benefits like the following:
a. Reduced cost of waste managementb. Savings in consumption of energy and materialsc. Lower distribution costsd. Improved corporate image among regulators, customers and the publice. Framework for continuous improvement of your environmental performance.
The manager who is “too busy managing the business” to listen to good senseabout environmental management could actually be costing the business plenty. Just think, for example, of the lost opportunities for achieving benefits like those above.
The ISO 14000 standards are management tools that will help your businessachieve environmental goals that go way beyond acquiring a mere “green sheen”.

What is a quality systems registrar

What is a quality systems registrar
A registrar, or registration body (the preferred term), is sometimes called a certification body. (Accreditation bodies are entirely different—they are the entities that audit/approve registration bodies.)
There are some 573 registration bodies in operation worldwide, including52 in the United States.
The registrar is the organization that checks your quality system and confirms that it meets ISO 9000 requirements for a prescribed and agreed period of time.
To do this, the registrar:a. Audits your organization’s quality system to determine the degree of conformity to ISO 9000 standards. The audit is carried out:— On paper (desktop study).— On site (throughout your facility).b. Registers your quality system, assuming it conforms, to ISO 9000.c. Monitors conformity on an ongoing basis by means of regular reauditsand other methods.All quality system registrars perform these functions, with certainvariations. Registrars differ in two principal ways:a. Accreditation status.b. Scope of accreditation
Reputable ISO 9000 registrars are accredited by international accreditationbodies. These enforce a standard, EN 45012 (European Standard for Bodies Certificating Suppliers’ Quality Systems), that governs the processes that registrars follow. This standard is quite strict:a. Registrars must make their services available to all qualified supplierswithout imposing undue financial or other conditions, andmust administer their regulations in a nondiscriminatory manner.b. The registrar’s organization must not engage in activities that mayaffect its impartiality. For example:— It must not provide consulting services “on matters to whichits certificates are related” (i.e., quality systems). This requirementis superseded by the ISO 9000 restriction noted earlier.— It must not directly engage in commerce with firms that it hasassessed and/or registered.— Individuals involved in the registration process must not haveprovided consulting services to registration clients, or any relatedfirms, within the previous two years.— Its employees and agents must not engage in business activitiesthat would cause others to question the firm’s impartiality.— The registrar may not market consultancy and registrationservices together, and may not recommend consulting servicesto clients.— Auditors may not give advice as part of registration audits.— The registrar must provide the accreditation body with documentationof its employees’ qualifications.— The registrar must have appropriate facilities for carrying outits activities.— The registrar must have a quality manual and documentedprocedures. (Curiously, EN 45012 does not require that registrarsregister to ISO 9000!)— Registrars may not grant or renew certificates of registration until all major noncompliances are eliminated.
Another point of differentiation is scope of accreditation. All registrarsare not accredited, or approved, to register firms in any line of business. Each registrar is accredited to operate within the business or industrial sectors about which it has documented expertise. This is generically referred to as the registrar’s scope.

Policy and Procedures for Quality Assurance

Quality PolicyThe Institute seeks to ensure that the following standards, guidelines, requirements and procedures are adhered to:· European Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area;· All relevant HETAC Standards and Guidelines;· National Framework of Qualifications Standards;· Policies and Procedures approved by the Institute’s Academic Council;· All other relevant regulatory and professional requirements.The Institute also seeks to ensure that its education provision and services meet the requirements of its students in a learner centered and supportive environment.1.2 CommunicationThis Policy is published on the Institute website and communicated to stakeholders through email alerts. It will be formally published in Institute Yearbook from September 2009.1.3 ImplementationIt is the responsibility of the President, the Registrar, the Academic Council, Heads of School, Heads of Department and Heads of Function to ensure that this policy is implemented.1.4 MeasurementThe policy is measured by internal audits, Programmatic Review and external peer review.1.5 EvaluationEach quality process will be audited for compliance by the Registrar’s Office annually. This audit can include recommendations for minor changes to the process. The audit reports will be placed before the Academic Council.The Academic Council will conduct an evaluation of each process against national and international best practice on a three year cycle. The environmental scanning technique discussed in the Institute’s Self-Study 2009 will support this evaluation.1.6 Continuous ImprovementRecommendations for improvement will be generated through the measures indicated in 1.4 and 1.5 above. The implementation of these recomendations will ensure continuous improvement.1.7 Key Performance Indicators(i) Each of the seven areas identified under the European Standards and Guidelines will be revised on a three year cycle. See 1.8 below.(ii) Best practice will become an embedded feature of the process and external peer review reports will testify that minimum standards are surpassed.
1.8 Goals and Objectives

BACKGROUND TO THE ISO 9001:2008 REVISION PROCESS

BACKGROUND TO THE ISO 9001:2008 REVISION PROCESS
In order to assist organizations to have a full understanding of the new ISO 9001:2008, it may be useful to have an insight on the revision process, how this revision reflects the inputs received from users of the standard, and the consideration given to benefits and impacts during its development.
Prior to the commencement of a revision (or amendment)to a management system standard, ISO/Guide 72:2001 Guidelines for the justification and development of management system standards recommends that a Justification Study” is prepared to present a case for the proposed project and that it outlines details of the data and inputs used to support its arguments. In relation to the development of ISO 9001:2008 user needs were identified from the following:
- the results of a formal “Systematic Review on ISO 9001:2000 that was performed by the members of ISO/TC 176/SC2 during 2003-2004
- feedback from the ISO/TC 176/Working Group on Interpretations,
- the results of an extensive worldwide “User Feedback Survey on ISO 9001 and ISO 9004″ by ISO/TC 176/SC 2/WG 18 and similar national surveys.
The key focuses of the ISO 9001:2008 amendment were to enhance the clarity of ISO 9001:2000 and to enhance its compatibility with ISO 14001:2004.
A tool for assessing the impacts versus benefits for proposed changes was created to assist the drafters of the amendment in deciding which changes should be included, and to assist in the verification of drafts against the identified user needs. The following decision making principles were applied:1) No changes with high impact would be incorporated into the standard;
2) Changes with medium impact would only be incorporated when they provided a correspondingly medium or high benefit to users of the standard;
3) Even where a change was low impact, it had to be justified by the benefits it delivered to users, before being incorporated.
The changes incorporated in this ISO 9001:2008 edition were classified in terms of impact into the following categorie
- No changes or minimum changes on user documents, including records
- No changes or minimum changes to existing processes of the organization
- No additional training required or minimal training required
- No effects on current certifications
The benefits identified for the ISO 9001:2008 edition fall into the following categories:
- Provides clarity
- Increases compatibility with ISO 14001.- Maintains consistency with ISO 9000 family of standards.
- Improves translatability.

ISO 14001 And The Environment

The ISO 14000 family of International Standards on environmental management is a relative newcomer to ISO’s portfolio – but enviroment-related standardization is far from being a new departure for ISO.
In fact, ISO has two-pronged approach to meeting the needs of business, industry, governments, non-governmental organizations and consumers in the field of the environment.
On the one hand, it offers a wideranging portfolio of standardized sampling, testing and analytical methods to deal with specific environmental challenges. It has developed more than 350 International Standards (out of a total morethan 12000) for the monitoring of such aspects as the quality of air, water and soil. These standards are means of providing business and government with scientifically valid data on the environmental effects of economic activity.
They also serve in a number of countries as the technical basis for environmental regulations.
ISO is leading a strategic approach by developing environmental management system standards that can be implemented in any type of organization in either public or private sectors (companies, administration, public utilities). To spearhead this strategic approach, ISO establish a new technical commitee, ISO /TC 207, Environmental management, in
1993. This followed ISO’s successful pioneering experience in management system standardization with the ISO 9000 series for quality management.
ISO’s direct involvement in environmental management stemmed from an intensive consultation process, carried out within the framework of a Strategic Advisory Group on Environment (SAGE),set up in 1991, in which 20 countrie, 11 international organizations and more than 100 environmental experts participated in defining the basic requirements of a new approach to environment-related standards.
This pioneering work was consolidated with ISO’s commitment to support the objective of “sustainable development” dicussed at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro in 1992.
Today, delegations of business and government experts from 55 countries have participate actively within TC 207,
and another 16 countries have observer status. These delegations are chosen by the national standars institute concerned and they are required to bring to TC 207 a national consensus on issue being addressed by the commitee.
This national consensus is derived from a process of consultation with interested parties.
From its beginning, it was recognized that ISO/TC 207 should have close cooperation with ISO/TC 176, Quality management and quality assurance, in the areas of management systems, auditing and related terminology. Active efforts are under way to ensure compatibility of ISO environmental management and quality management standards, for the benefit of all organizations wishing to implement them.

ISO 9001 – Compatibility with other management systems

ISO 9001 – Compatibility with other management systems
ISO 9001 and ISO 9004 are quality management system standards which have been designed to complement each other, but can also be used independently.ISO 9001 specifies requirements for a quality management system that can be used for internal application by organizations, for certification, or for contractual purposes. It focuses on the effectiveness of the qualitymanagement system in meeting customer requirements.ISO 9004 gives guidance on a wider range of objectives of a quality management system than does ISO 9001, particularly for the continual improvement of an organizations overall performance and efficiency, as well as its effectiveness. ISO 9004 is recommended as a guide for organizations whose top management wishes to move beyond the requirements of ISO 9001, in pursuit of continual improvement of performance. However, it is not intended for certification or for contractual purposes.
During the development of this International Standard, due consideration was given to the provisions of ISO 14001:2004 to enhance the compatibility of the two standards for the benefit of the user community.This International Standard does not include requirements specific to other management systems, such as those particular to environmental management, occupational health and safety management, financialmanagement or risk management. However, this International Standard enables an organization to align or integrate its own quality management system with related management system requirements. It is possible foran organization to adapt its existing management system(s) in order to establish a quality management system that complies with the requirements of this International Standard.

Quality Planning

Whenever the term “product” is used within the ISO 9001 standard, it refers to both tangible goods and intangible services. The ISO 9001 standard is meant to be generic which means that it is suitable for all kinds of organization, whether commercial or otherwise. The purpose of the quality management system model that is being propagated by the standard is the fulfillment of customer requeirements and expectations in order to induce high levels of customer satisfaction. An unsatisfied customer is essentially a customer whose requirements or needs, and expectations of the level of services being granted upon him/her have not been met. We are all customers because we buy products all the time. So we know what it means to be a dissatisfied customer. The common reaction is to never to go back to that seller and look for other alternatives. A successful organization is one which understands what it takes to meet customer requirements in order to satisfy their needs and expectations. A specific process is thus necessary to resolve any customer complaint or dispute. This process should be geared towards satisfying the customer’s needs and expectations. The parameters of this process should be referenced from the terms of the sale and purchase. This is why it is necessary to review the customer’s requirements before committing to the sales contract. It is necessary that the customer understands what he/she is paying for and it is equally necessary for the organization to understand what it is supposed to deliver. When your organization has these processes in place, then the only thing to do next is to continually measure the effectiveness and subsequently take actions to continually improve the whole process.
For more information, please visit http://www.iso9001-standard.us

ISO 14001 And The Environment

The ISO 14000 family of International Standards on environmental management is a relative newcomer to ISO’s portfolio – but enviroment-related standardization is far from being a new departure for ISO.
In fact, ISO has two-pronged approach to meeting the needs of business, industry, governments, non-governmental organizations and consumers in the field of the environment.
On the one hand, it offers a wideranging portfolio of standardized sampling, testing and analytical methods to deal with specific environmental challenges. It has developed more than 350 International Standards (out of a total morethan 12000) for the monitoring of such aspects as the quality of air, water and soil. These standards are means of providing business and government with scientifically valid data on the environmental effects of economic activity.
They also serve in a number of countries as the technical basis for environmental regulations.
ISO is leading a strategic approach by developing environmental management system standards that can be implemented in any type of organization in either public or private sectors (companies, administration, public utilities). To spearhead this strategic approach, ISO establish a new technical commitee, ISO /TC 207, Environmental management, in
1993. This followed ISO’s successful pioneering experience in management system standardization with the ISO 9000 series for quality management.
ISO’s direct involvement in environmental management stemmed from an intensive consultation process, carried out within the framework of a Strategic Advisory Group on Environment (SAGE),set up in 1991, in which 20 countrie, 11 international organizations and more than 100 environmental experts participated in defining the basic requirements of a new approach to environment-related standards.
This pioneering work was consolidated with ISO’s commitment to support the objective of “sustainable development” dicussed at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro in 1992.
Today, delegations of business and government experts from 55 countries have participate actively within TC 207,
and another 16 countries have observer status. These delegations are chosen by the national standars institute concerned and they are required to bring to TC 207 a national consensus on issue being addressed by the commitee.
This national consensus is derived from a process of consultation with interested parties.
From its beginning, it was recognized that ISO/TC 207 should have close cooperation with ISO/TC 176, Quality management and quality assurance, in the areas of management systems, auditing and related terminology. Active efforts are under way to ensure compatibility of ISO environmental management and quality management standards, for the benefit of all organizations wishing to implement them.

Establishing a ISO 9001 records procedure

Establishing a ISO 9001 records procedure
The standard requires records to remain legible, readily identifiable and retrievable and that a procedure defines the controls needed for the identification, storage, protection, retrieval, retention time and disposition of records. Records have a life cycle. They are generated during
which time they acquire an identity and are then assigned for storage for a prescribed period.

During use and storage they need to be protected from inadvertent or malicious destruction and as they may be required to support current activities or investigations, they need to be brought out of storage quickly. When their usefulness has lapsed, a decision is made as to whether to
retain them further or to destroy them.

Readily retrievable means that records can be obtained on demand within a reasonable period (hours not days or weeks) Readily identifiable means that the identity can be discerned at a glance.

Although the requirement implies a single procedure, several may be necessary because there are several unconnected tasks to perform. A procedure cannot in fact ensure a result. It may prescribe a course of action which if followed may lead to the correct result, but it is the process that ensures the result not the procedure.

The revised requirement omits several aspects covered in clause 4.16 of the 1994 version.
Collection of records is now addressed by Analysis of data (clause 8.4)
Indexing of records is a specific form of identification and is therefore already addressed
Access is now addressed by the requirement for record retrieval
Filing is a specific form of storage and is therefore already addressed

You may only need one procedure which covers all the requirements but this is not always practical. The provisions you make for specific records should be included in the documentation for controlling the activity being recorded. For example, provisions for inspection records should be included in the inspection procedures; provisions for design review records should be included in the design review procedure. Within such procedures you should provide the forms (or content requirement for the records), the identification, collection/submission provisions, the indexing and filing provisions. It may be more practical to cover the storage, disposal and retention provisions in separate procedures because they may not be type-dependent. Where each department retains their own records, these provisions may vary and therefore warrant
separate procedures.

Unlike prescriptive documents, records may contain handwritten elements and therefore it is important that the handwriting is legible. If this becomes a problem, you either improve discipline or consider electronic data capture.

Records also become soiled in a workshop environment so may need to be protected to remain legible. With electronically captured data, legibility is often not a problem. However, photographs and other scanned images may not transfer as well as the original and lose detail so care has to be taken in selecting appropriate equipment for this task.

Whatever the records, they should carry some identification in order that you can determine what they are, what kind of information they record and what they relate to. A simple way of doing this is to give each record a reference number and a name or title in a prominent location on the record.

1994 –2000 Differences

Previously the standard covered retrieval in four ways. It required:

(a) that quality records be made available for evaluation by the customer or his representative for an agreed period, where agreed contractually. Records can take various forms – reports containing narrative, computer data, and forms containing data in boxes, graphs, tables, lists and many others.

Where forms are used to collect data, they should carry a form number and name as their identification. When completed they should carry a serial number to give each a separate identity. Records should also be traceable to the product or service they represent and this can be achieved either within the reference number or separately, provided that the chance of mistaken identity is eliminated. The standard does not require records to be identifiable
to the product involved but unless you do make such provision you will not be able to access the pertinent records or demonstrate conformance to specified requirements.

ISO 14001 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

ISO 14001 was first published in 1996 and specifies the actual requirements for an environmental management system. It applies to those environmental aspects which the organization has control and over which it can be expected to have an influence.
ISO 14001 is often seen as the corner stone standard of the ISO 14000 series. However, it is not only the most well known, but is the only ISO 14000 standard against which it is currently possible to be certified by an external certification authority. Having stated this, it does not itself state specific environmental performance criteria.
This standard is applicable to any organization that wishes to:
- implement, maintain and improve an environmental management system- assure itself of its conformance with its own stated environmental policy (those policy commitments of course must be made)- demonstrate conformance- ensure compliance with environmental laws and regulations- seek certification of its environmental management system by an external third party organization- make a self-determination of conformance

ISO14000 SERIES ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS

ISO 14000, ISO14001 ISO 14004… the myriad of ISO14000 standards and information related to environmental management can sometimes hinder progress and cause confusion. This web site is designed to untangle and simpify these – to make environmental management using the above standards a much easier task.
Each of these standards and items is explained, and a series of simple to use resources and guides identified. Hopefully, these pages will help you ensure that you meet your obligations diligently and professionally, but with the minumum of fuss.
ISO 14001 was first published in 1996 and specifies the actual requirements for an environmental management system. It applies to those environmental aspects which the organization has control and over which it can be expected to have an influence.

ISO 9000 series of standards

ISO 9001 is one of a series of quality management system standards. It can help bring out the best in your organization by enabling you to understand your processes for delivering your products/services to your customers. The ISO 9001 series of standards consist of:
- ISO 9000 – Fundamentals and Vocabulary: this introduces the user to the concepts behind the management systems and specifies the terminology used.- ISO 9001 – Requirements: this sets out the criteria you will need to meet if you wish to operate in accordance with the standard and gain certification.- ISO 9004 – Guidelines for performance improvement: based upon the eight quality management principles, these are designed to be used by senior management as a framework to guide their organizations towards improved performance by considering the needs of all interested parties, not just customers.
ISO 9001 is suitable for any organization looking to improve the way it is operated and managed, regardless of size or sector. However, the best returns on investment come from those companies that are prepared to implement it throughout their organization rather than at particular sites, departments or divisions.

Measurement and Evaluation In ISO 14001:2004

After implementing the environmental policy, management needs to measure environmental that the data can be verified by an internal or external auditor.
interventions and their impact on the environment. This is done by building up an environmental effects register (environmental inventory). All equipment used for monitoring and measuring must be accurate and calibrated on a regular basis. To check the compliance status of an organization, additional information about regulations and other requirements is needed. A so called environmental regulations register?Eis often installed and maintained for this purpose. To obtain a better picture about the financial consequences of environmental protection, the accounting system should reflect environmental costs. Therefore, information about environmentally-induced costs and earnings needs to be collected. All this information should be recorded in such a manner.er
Environmental Performance Evaluation Accesses Environment Performance against environmental targets and objectives and against applicable environmental regulations. Responsibilities and authority need to be defined to deal with non-compliance within the EMS. This includes specifying the actions to be taken to correct an undesirable ituation and to prevent future non-compliance.
The analysis of environmental and economic performance leads to eco efficiency, the key component in sustainable business management.
The analysis of environmental and economic performance leads to eco
efficiency, the key component in sustainable business management. The recording of physical environmental data, environmental regulations and environmentally-induced financial information is necessary as a basis for effective decision making. Therefore, financial, legal and ecological data systems must be built up from scratch or adapted to the requirements of the EMS standard.

Conducting An Initial Environmental Review For EMS

Conducting An Initial Environmental Review in ISO 14001 EMSAn initial environmental review covers all the aspects of an EMS. As a result of this review the organization knows its strengths and weaknesses, risks and opportunities regarding the current status of its EMS. The gap between the requirements of the EMS standard and the actual status of the organization shows which aspects the organization should focus its efforts on to improve the system. This leads directly to the development of an environmental management program that should fill the gaps.The Environmental review should focus on three key areas:- Examination of existing environmental management practices and procedures- Identification of significant environmental impacts and their priority- Identification of legal and regulatory requirements1. Examination of Existing Environmental Management Practices andProceduresThe methodology for assessing existing environmental management practices and procedures is proposed here using a questionnaire. The review team fills out this questionnaire by interviewing appropriate people, by analyzing existing documents and procedures dealing with environmental issues and by collecting information about environmental aspects of the organization’s operations, products and services.By conducting the initial environmental review, an organization-specific profile of strengths and weaknesses can be drawn up. Because the score in each EMS area shows the effort needed in terms of financial and human resources,the organization knows where to focus its efforts when building up an EMS and where the largest effort is needed.
2. Identification of Significant Environmental Aspects and their PriorityAn environmental policy requires top management to set priorities regarding environmental aspects. An initial review clearly shows where to set priorities regarding the EMS itself. But, it does not help to set priorities among different environmental problems. Many top managers feel pressure to do something for the environment and thus embark on some form of ?Eenvironmental activism?E often containing many isolated activities, but no clear direction. One way to solve this problem is to develop a so called ?Environmental exposure portfolio?EThe first step of this portfolio analysis is to assess the exposure and therefore the importance of different environmental aspects for an organization’s overall performance.The appropriate perspective and priorities of the environmental policy will differ depending on this preliminary analysis. The analysis should be conducted from the perspective of the stakeholders of the organization, their needs and their importance for the success of the organization. The degree of exposure to different environmental aspects should guide the involvement and perspective of an organization when implementing an EMS. Evaluating exposure to environmental aspects is important, because this exposure is likely to influence the organization’s success sooner or later, either through new legislation, public or consumer perception and behavior or otherwise.The analysis of the expected exposure of an organization to different environmental problems and the weight given to these aspects by various stakeholders enables management to focus on environmental issues that are a high priority to the organization. This is represented in the quadrant in the upper right corner of the environmental exposure portfolio. However, the two quadrants on the left must also be observed, although less vigorously. Issues with low public priority, to which the firm contributes heavily become a problem as soon as the perception of the stakeholders and the public environmental policy changes (the quadrant in the upper left corner of the portfolio). That this can happen very rapidly is obvious, for example from Shell`s ?Brent Spar?Edumping case (detailed information about this case is available from Shell or Greenpeace at their respective WWW-sites). Investments in new production technology, products and services can increase the environmental impact of the organization when not anticipated early enough. In this case, a problem ranked in the lower right corner of the portfolio would shift to the field with the highest priority. Problems ranked in the lower left corner are of no priority. No measures should be taken here.
3. Identification of Legal and Regulatory RequirementsThe identification of legal and regulatory requirements assesses two levels of an organization:- production-related environmental regulations- product- and service-related environmental regulationsThe former addresses the production department while the latter addresses the marketingand R&D departments. Basically, three questions must be answered:- Which are the relevant environmental regulations? (= target)- Is the current situation in the organization known? (= actual)- Does the organization comply with relevant regulations? (=gap)The methodology used here is a questionnaire. To obtain information about environmental regulations the following information sources can be used:- governmental authorities- industry associations- daily newspaper- university publications (law departments

Nonconformity, Corrective Action and Preventive Action in ISO 14001 EMS

The intent of §4.5.3 is that the organization put in place procedures for 1) identifying actual and potential nonconformities to EMS requirements, 2) taking appropriate corrective or preventive action, and 3) reviewing the effectiveness of corrective or preventive actions taken.The nonconformity requirement of ISO 14001:1996 was a passive requirement in that it was only triggered when a nonconformity came to the attention of the organization through one of the other EMS procedures, such as the EMS audit or management review. ISO 14001:2004, however, requires that the organization establish and maintain procedures to identify actual or potential nonconformities, determine their causes, take action to avoid recurrence or occurrence, record results, and review effectiveness of corrective or preventive actions.
How the organization goes about identifying actual or potential nonconformities is up to it to determine. From the standpoint of registration auditors, it would seem that they would want to see a specific procedure requiring members of the organization to conduct some kind of periodic checklist driven, walk-through inspection for nonconformities. In addition, the procedure should allow for submission of nonconformities by any member of the organization. Actual nonconformities are usually fairly evident and relatively easy to investigate because there is a tangible occurrence with which to deal. The organization should also want to evaluate minor instances of nonconformity that, while not significant in and of themselves, if they occurred under different circumstances, could lead to a significant deviation from the EMS. Such “near misses” could be identified by the occurrence of a sudden, unexpected event, a failure to achieve an objective or target, or a deviation from the Environmental Policy.Potential nonconformities are more difficult to identify and correct. Here, application of Failure Mode and Effects Analysis would be appropriate for organizations having that capability.
When investigating nonconformities, organizations should focus on identifying underlying root causes, not just the immediate manifestation of the problem. If a chemical storage drum leaks, the organization should take action, first, to mitigate the damage and, then, to determine why the leak occurred; e.g., improper or negligent handling, mechanical failure, or lack of a leak detection system. Corrective or preventive actions should then focus on eliminating the cause through training, communication of procedures, use of leak-resistant drums, or installation of a leak detection system.
Other ISO 14001 sections, principally Emergency Preparedness and Response, Internal Audit, and Management Review, are tools that the organization implements in order to help identify instances of actual or potential nonconformity. The underlying principle of these sections is that the identification of nonconformities should be made by the organization through diligent application of these tools, not from the occurrence of an environmental event, a customer or community complaint, or investigation by a regulatory authority. While §4.5.3 does not specifically mention disciplinary action, in many cases disciplinary action or the threat of disciplinary action is appropriate to prevention of future nonconformities. Many organizations have written codes of conduct that give employees notice that deviations from the codes will not be tolerated and that prescribed penalties can result for infractions. These codes can be expanded to include penalties for deviations from the EMS. If so, penalties should be commensurate with the violation itself and should acknowledge the nature of the environmental damage, the degree of negligence, prior conduct, and the forthrightness of the employee being disciplined. Any such code and its remedies should be administered fairly and consistently and should have as its objective correction and prevention of EMS nonconformities, not punishment of employees.Finally, identification, investigation, and correction of nonconformities leads to the need to revise documented procedures.